Creating Onramps and Inviting In.
Before Patrick and I left Denver, we attended an event at Denver University. It was one of many talks in a collection called Catalyst Series for Social Justice. The main speaker was an activist from Baltimore named DeRay Mckesson. DeRay said a lot of things that impacted me but there was one comment he made that stuck. DeRay said, “we don’t all enter conversations at the same point or level, so sometimes you have to create onramps for people.”
Creating onramps for people…what a concept. It’s something that I think about often. I used to think and journal about it daily. How do we create onramps? It’s difficult and takes time and practice. It requires that you see the other person’s point of view and where they are in their learning. I think it requires love and patience and grace. It demands that you step outside of yourself and your feelings in order to serve the relationship.
I have not mastered the art of creating onramps but I do think that I have reached a level of proficiency. To me, creating onramps means disagreeing with people well and respectfully. Lovingly sharing information and pointing out wrong doings. It’s about prioritizing the relationship while still valuing truth and your own mental and emotional well-being.
I want to be clear that I’m not talking about engaging with acquaintances. This is not a toolkit for how to deal with some random dude online that says racist and hurtful things. I’m talking about the people in our lives that we want to continue to be in our lives. Our friends and relatives. People that we love and cherish. People who we can trust. People who love us and want the best for us and yet at times, say and do things that hurt and disappoint us. So, when that happens how should we respond?
If someone I love posts something that bothers me, feels dismissive of my feelings or is even racist, the first thing I do before I message them is check my intentions. I do that by asking myself a series of questions. Why am I messaging them? What do I hope to gain from this interaction? What exactly did they say or do that bothers me? Was their comment actually racist or did it just offend me? Am I in the right frame of mind to have a thoughtful discussion?
It’s important for me that I’m able to formulate answers to those questions. If my intentions are not aligned with the goal of creating onramps and inviting them INTO a conversation, then I do not engage. I do this for the sake of the relationship. I do not want to say something from a place of anger and pain that blocks learning and progress, even if that anger and pain is warranted.
Once I’ve checked my intentions and find them to be aligned with my values, I take a moment to outline what happened and identify why it’s problematic. In order to do this, I again ask myself a series of questions. What did they say? Why is it dangerous? Why was it hurtful to me? How could this be hurtful to others? How does that belief system or rhetoric connect to bigger systemic issues?
I like to believe that when our friends and family say or post hurtful things, that it’s not intentional. I have to believe in good intent even when the outcome is painful. So, when I’m answering these questions, I’m attempting to meet them where they are and to draw a line for them. A line from what they said to where it landed.
This takes a lot of mental and emotional work. Which is why I don’t do it for everybody. When a random person that I met in college says something crazy online, even if I considered them to be a friend, I delete them. That might sound extreme, maybe it is extreme but for me it’s necessary. It takes so much energy and space to engage in these conversations that I make it a priority to do so thoughtfully and sparingly. When I count the costs, sometimes I find that it’s emotionally and mentally cheaper to just remove that person from my space then to muster up the energy to have a discussion.
Connecting what a person said to a bigger systemic issue is something I learned from Ijeoma Oluo in her book So You Want to Talk About Race. The idea is to show them how their comments can have far reaching impacts. The words that we say, especially ones that perpetuate racist and prejudice stereotypes, have power. When someone makes a joke about a Black woman being aggressive because she advocated for herself, it’s not just problematic, it’s harmful.
Those kinds of stereotypes when believed by a supervisor can lead to a person getting written up or even fired. If I can’t speak up without someone calling me aggressive, confrontational or a threat, that can lead to me internalizing that belief and advocating for myself less. Which can lead to me potentially enduring abusive situations because of fear of being labeled and stereotyped.
When we show the people in our lives how their beliefs and their comments cause real harm, I believe it humanizes the issue for them. It goes from being just a “joke”, or just a “comment”, to being something that is hurting their loved ones. So that’s why I make it plain and clear and outline the pain that has been caused and how it connects to a bigger issue.
Once I have checked my intentions, outlined what happened and identify why it’s problematic the last thing that I do before reaching out is set a goal. I set a goal so that I can have a north star to guide me through the conversation. Something to navigate towards, and direct me so that I don’t get too sidetracked and end up defeating the purpose.
I center the goal on aspects of the conversation that I can control. For example a goal may be “to clearly communicate how their comment perpetuates racist stereotypes.” It’s a goal that is simple, clear and easy to follow. The goal is also realistic. I stray away from creating goals like “to make sure they never say or post anything harmful again.” A goal like that not only centers the response of the person I’m engaging but it leaves no room for mistakes. Trying to go from 0-100 can lead to resentment and broken relationships. We’re human and often change takes time, give them and yourself grace by making sure your goal is simple and realistic.
To recap, before I engage in prickly conversations with the people I love, I check my intentions and make sure they align with my core values of creating onramps and inviting people INTO a space of learning. Next, I outline what happened and identify why it’s problematic making sure to tie the stereotype to a larger systemic issue. Lastly, I create a goal for the conversation and use that as my north star to guide the discussion.
If it seems like a lot of work, that’s because it is. I think that anything as important as addressing harmful behavior and rhetoric in our inner circles, is bound to be time consuming but what other choice do we have? Ignore it and hope someone else addresses it? Act like it never happened and continue in ignorance? I think not. I’ll work on holding my people accountable and inviting them into a space of growth and learning and I ask that you do the same with yours.
I hope that this post is helpful for you as you navigate tough conversations with the people that you love. I’m rooting for you!
Until next time,
XOXO - N