A Thought on Bipartisan Community.
(To start this post I want to be transparent with the political views that I currently hold and a reminder of my identities. I am a Black Woman of Afro Caribbean descent living in Pennsylvania. Many of my views are progressive and align with The Green Party and I will be voting for Biden in the upcoming election. Now, let’s get started.)
Last week I started a discussion on social media. It was about being in community with people who believe differently than we do. The post stemmed from a thought that has been on my mind, off and on, for the last three years. We’re familiar with the narrative of “not talking to or being friends with,” people who believe differently than we do and I wanted to hear from people with the opposite opinion.
I didn’t expect for the post to get as much attention as it did. A lot of people shared their thoughts and opinions and all of their comments aligned with two trains of thoughts. Thoughts that didn’t actually answer my specific question but that did enforce a few things that I already believed to be true. Here are the two main sentiments that I saw in the comments;
That we can disagree on trivial things but if we disagree on things related to what we consider to be human rights issues then we can no longer be in relationship/community with each other.
That we think it’s important to be in community with people who believe differently but don’t know how to have those conversations without it leading to an argument.
Both sentiments I understand. The second one I think is self explanatory. The first one, I used to adhere to religiously and is one that I still prescribe to in some ways and with some people. My thought behind it is, I don’t think that we ALL need to entertain ALL conversations. We don’t ALL need to be friends with ALL people. Sometimes we have to have boundaries and protect our mental health and peace by limiting the things that we talk about with people and limiting the people that we’re friends with. So that’s partially where I stand.
With that being said, my beliefs have evolved a lot in the last few years. When it comes to the idea of not even associating with people who believe, on a foundational level differently than we do, I find myself concerned. I am concerned that our friend group, our group of associates, our workplace, is not bipartisan. When I say bipartisan I mean it in the truest context of the word. Composed of people who have beliefs that are on opposite sides of certain issues but can still come together in agreement.
I am concerned that we may be living in echo chambers and surrounding ourselves only with people who mirror our beliefs and values.
I am concerned by this because I think it’s harmful. Not just harmful to us in the way that it can impact our ability to see humanity in other people but also extremely detrimental to our society. I don’t see how that strategy leads to societal growth. I’m concerned because I don’t understand how minds can be changed and belief systems reevaluated if they’re never challenged in love. I don’t see how we can grow and add depth to our morals and values that way.
I don’t see how we expect to see laws pass through the House and the Senate that way. I understand where the sentiment comes from but I just don’t understand how it’s effective in making our country a more equitable place.
Unpopular opinion; there is humanity to be found in opposing views and the people that hold them. I think that when we approach someone with curiosity and not judgement and they do the same for us, we have a chance to understand the root of their belief systems. Again, I’m not talking about hateful, racial slur slinging BIGOTS. I’m talking about people who voted republican that you don’t like because they voted for Trump. I’m talking about people who voted democrat that you don’t like because they voted for Hillary.
I’m talking about the democrats that you don’t like because you think they support babies being “killed.” I’m talking about the Republicans that you don’t like because you think they support children being separated from their parents at the southern border.
I’m talking about people who are voting in a way that they think is the most moral and humanity affirming way and yet it’s different from the way that I’m voting or that you’re voting.
Is it possible that the opposing view (the democrat view, the republican view) is not always rooted in the hate that we believe it to be? Is it possible? I would like to find out. I am interested in seeing what happens when people with good intentions and strong morality, that plays out in vastly different ways, agree to see and affirm the humanity in the other.
I am interested in seeing what happens and if it leads to people understanding things better and voting differently based on that new understanding. I’m interested in seeing if the curious search for humanity can lead to a person changing the language that they use because they discover that it is hurtful to someone they’re now in relationship with.
I think it’s easy to just believe that people are selfish and hateful and I think many are but I truly believe that most aren’t. So...what does that mean? What does that lead to? I’m not sure but I’m interested to find out.